Why is remote drug testing more challenging than remote alcohol testing using a breathalyzer?
Transcript
Remote drug testing for non-alcoholic substances is more challenging than remote alcohol breathalyzer testing, primarily because verifying that the specimen belongs to the donor is much more challenging and invasive. As we know, remote breathalyzers either use facial recognition technology, they use someone else witnessing that collection, which is not very invasive, someone blowing into a breathalyzer. Whereas if you're drug testing, urine drug testing your client, for them to be verified that the urine is theirs, they must be watched by a third party person. If the family law stakeholders choose not to do observed urine collection, it makes it very difficult for those drug test results to be legally defensible and used within that dispute. U verify is a fully remote, unobserved urine drug test that also tests for alcohol. The way it's different is it doesn't require observation from another person to verify that the urine belongs to the donor. Instead, we use forensic DNA verification technology to match that urine specimen to the desired person. And we also use Forensic synthetic urine detection technology to further make sure that that specimen belongs to that person and is also real human urine. U-Verify also differs from standard or traditional collection site-based urine drug testing because it can be done anywhere at any time, including the weekends. We have flat rate pricing across the country, and participants and clients can also carry collection kits with them when they're traveling, working, or just completing parental responsibilities on a daily basis.
About the contributor

Get Help
Ready to speak with a divorce lawyer?
Connect with experienced divorce attorneys in your area.
Find a Lawyer